Sample Analysis
What we actually look for.
This is pulled from a real church statement. Identifying details removed.
Most churches don't have a generosity problem.
They have a system problem.
This is what we look for in the first 10–15 minutes of a statement.
Where money is leaking.
Where it's being missed.
What's actually worth fixing.
Church snapshot
- Mid-sized church
- ~$1.2M annual digital giving (cards + ACH)
- ~40–45% of total giving digital
- ~25–30% recurring
What we saw immediately
- Processing rates sitting ~0.8–1.1% above market
- Expired cards and failed ACH gifts not being recovered
- Giving flow causing drop-off before completion
- Recurring not clearly positioned at the moment of decision
What that actually meant
- ~$12K–$18K/year lost to processing inefficiency
- ~$40K–$80K/year missed from failed or incomplete gifts
- Inconsistent giving due to low recurring adoption
Most of this wasn't obvious. It was buried in the statement.
What changed
- Processing structure corrected
- Failed gift recovery put in place
- Giving flow simplified (mobile-first)
- Recurring clearly positioned at the point of decision
What happened after
- ~$90K–$140K captured annually that was previously being lost
- Recurring giving increased into the 40%+ range
- More consistent month-to-month giving
Giving didn't increase because people became more generous.
The system stopped losing it.
The answer was already in their statement.
It usually is.
What you actually get
- Clear breakdown of where money is being lost
- Exact dollar impact tied to your system
- What's worth fixing vs what's not
- Prioritized next steps (no guesswork)
No platform switch required.
See what your system is actually doing.
We'll show you exactly what your system is capturing —
and what it's quietly losing.
One statement. 48 hours. Clear answers. No call required.
Most churches we review are losing money.
They just can't see it yet.